Home » Resource Library » Qualitrol Blog » SAG Mill Motor Programmed Rewind: Planned & On-Budget
Sag Mill Motor

SAG Mill Motor Programmed Rewind

During a visual inspection and condition assessment on the SAG mill, an insulation anomaly was identified in the rotor. To remove the risk of unexpected failure, the team planned and executed a programmed rewind within a 10-day shutdown window.

Scope & Timeline (10-Day Program)

PhaseDaysKey Activities
Pre-outage preparationWeeks priorSpecification preparation; global tendering; tender evaluation; vendor audits (Dalian, China & Auckland, NZ); witness testing of coils; logistics planning; HSE and QA plans.
De-energize & disassembleDay 1–2Lockout/tagout; rotor removal from stator; clean and inspect core, wedges, ventilation; verify fits and clearances; confirm work fronts.
Rewind executionDay 3–7Strip old windings; install new coils; connections and brazing; slot cell/liners as required; blocking and bracing; varnish/curing (per spec and vendor procedure).
Electrical & mechanical testsDay 8–9IR/PI, winding resistance balance, surge/hi-pot per spec, shaft/runout checks, vibration baseline, thermography. Owner’s rep signs QA records.
CommissioningDay 10Cold and hot commissioning, protection checks, no-load to load ramp, post-start inspection; handover package with as-built drawings and test results.


Why On-Site vs Off-Site?

On-Site Planned RewindOff-Site Shop Rewind
Minimal transport risk and no cranage/shipping delays; shortest outage path when space and utilities allow.Access to full shop tooling/fixtures and ovens; useful when site access is restricted or major machining is required.
Tighter schedule control with the owner’s superintendent on the floor; easier integration with plant HSE and permits.Extra time for disconnect, packaging, transport, re-install, and alignment can extend lost-production days.
Lower total cost when downtime is the driver; this project finished on time and on budget (~$250k) and avoided about $700k versus a traditional off-site path.Higher logistics and outage duration typically raise total cost even if the shop rate is competitive.


Quality Assurance & Verification

  • Witness testing of coils before delivery; vendor audits completed in China and New Zealand.
  • Electrical acceptance tests: IR/PI, winding resistance balance, surge/hi-pot to spec, partial discharge checks as applicable, and thermography.
  • Mechanical acceptance: runout/alignment, end-winding support checks, vibration baseline at no-load and load.

Our Recommended Monitoring & Program Tools

  • PDA-IV (portable PD testing) for periodic post-rewind checks using installed 80 pF EMC sensors; analysis in PDView.
  • GuardII+ or PDTracII 4208 for continuous PD trending on critical motors; alarms support early intervention between shutdowns.
  • FluxTrac (if synchronous) rotor magnetic-flux monitoring to detect shorted turns early and verify rotor health after rewind.

Outcome

The programmed on-site rewind returned the SAG mill motor to reliable service within the planned 10-day window. The project delivered on time and on budget (~$250k) with an estimated net saving of about $700k versus an off-site repair, while strengthening QA rigor and future monitoring.

Install 80 pF EMC Sensors for PD Baselines

Permanent coupling capacitors that enable both periodic PDA-IV testing and continuous GuardII+ monitoring on critical motors.